Sunday, November 22, 2009

Who is the most oppressive and unjust?

A former Iranian vice president has been sentenced to six years in jail after being accused of fomenting unrest to overthrow the government, his lawyer said today.

Mohammad Ali Abtahi is the most senior reformer to face imprisonment following the disputed presidential election in June. Abtahi was vice president for parliamentary and legal affairs during the 1997-2005 presidency of Mohammad Khatami.
Read the story here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/22/mohammad-ali-abtahi-iran-protests-jailed

The government cited above is, by American standards of Justice, arguably one of the most oppressive and unjust political systems in the world. And the "guilty" party here is sentenced to "six years in jail after being accused of fomenting unrest to overthrow the government".

Yet, our government here in Amerika routinely passes out sentences that long and longer for the considerably lesser offenses such as DUI and simple pot possession. Aren't you glad that your tax dollars are used so wisely? The "war on drugs", the "war on crime", and the "war on terrorism"... all distractions designed to keep YOU in FEAR and bleeding you dry.




I ask you, who is the most oppressive and unjust?

Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Rally held, charges of racism against Kennett, MO

KENNETT, MO (KAIT) – Supporters from across the country converged on the Dunklin County Courthouse Monday to voice public outrage against the Kennett Police Department and Dunklin County Prosecutor’s Office. Heather Ellis, 24, cut in line at the Kennett Wal-Mart on January 6, 2007 and created a disturbance after police were called, court documents said. According to court filings, Ellis assaulted two white police officers who told her to leave the premises. She was arrested on two felony counts of assaulting a police officer and two misdemeanor violations.

Ellis, a black school teacher in Louisiana, was in college at the time of her arrest. She charges customers and police officers as being racially disingenuous.
...

Counter protestors also watched the march as it traveled down First Street. Counter protestors [sic] were holding Confederate flags with swastikas and skulls.

See the whole article here: http://www.kait8.com/global/story.asp?s=11517159


If there was any question about the racist atmosphere in Kennett, MO, the last quoted paragraph should help put things in perspective for you. And if you read the comments to the article, it should remove all doubt. The sad part is that these bigoted rednecks don't even realize that they are racist. The racist, fascist atmosphere permeates the entire region. They are indoctrinated in church, in school and in their homes.

As noted in the above article snippets, at the protest rally prior to the trial counter protesters showed up waving confederate flags and swastikas just to prove that the aren't prejudice. Morons.

I'll add this from personal experience: There is no doubt in my mind that most of the local law enforcement around here is racist. And hand in hand with their racism goes their fascism. However, I don't think that the prosecutor, Steve Sokoloff, is a racist. At least not overtly. He's simply a fascist. He definitely allows his personal feelings and convictions to interfere with the execution of his duties. He pursues personal vendetta's at the bench. He also allow "his buddies" to walk free on identical charges to those he sends away for years.

UPDATE:
Heather Ellis plead guilty to two misdemeanors and received 4 days in county jail, 1 year unsupervised probation, and mandatory anger management classes. The plea was reached after it was disclosed that the officers and witnesses in the case had a private conference together prior to the trial. It is speculated that this time was used to "get their stories straight". In fact, witness testimony included information that was not included in the original police reports suggesting that their stories were embellished for trial. Let's hope that the various anti-discrimination organizations who have been drawn to this case keep a close eye on this town and county. This story is not over. But the story is not about Heather Ellis. It is about a clan of racist bigots and their nepotistic, isolationist, white supremacist, Christian Fascist behavior.

Share/Bookmark

Saturday, November 07, 2009

When "Confidential" isn't really that confidential

Does anyone else see a problem with the following excerpt from Yahoo! News?

Senior Obama administration officials have stepped up consultations with key allies, laying the ground for an announcement on strategy and troop levels.

In his confidential troop request, McChrystal said 40,000 additional troops were needed to help secure Afghan population centers and to give NATO some additional resources to take on Taliban and al Qaeda fighters in outlying areas.

When it is reported on Yahoo! News, it's not all that fucking confidential, now is it?

And I seem to remember something about the cock sucker, McMeth, going public with his demands some time ago, too. So, why the pretense?

Share/Bookmark

Friday, November 06, 2009

Does anyone else find it odd...

Does anyone else find it odd that:

Our lawmakers will pass an $800b bill that funds mass murder in foreign lands without batting an eye but seems paralyzed and polarized when it comes to spending a fraction ($90b) of that figure to save American lives with health care reform?

When 90 or more people are killed by a robot at a wedding or funeral in a foreign land it is referred to as an unfortunate incident, if it is acknowledged at all, yet when 13 soldiers are killed in their own country by one of their own where they are trained to kill it is referred to as "a massacre"?

I'm just sayin'...

Share/Bookmark

Thursday, November 05, 2009

"Cash for Clunkers" just put more clunkers back on the road... ones with bank notes, though!

WASHINGTON (AP) - The most common deals under the government's $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program, aimed at putting more fuel-efficient cars on the road, replaced old Ford or Chevrolet pickups with new ones that got only marginally better gas mileage, according to an analysis of new federal data by The Associated Press.

The single most common swap - which occurred more than 8,200 times - involved Ford F150 pickup owners who took advantage of a government rebate to trade their old trucks for new Ford F150s. They were 17 times more likely to buy a new F150 than, say, a Toyota Prius. The fuel economy for the new trucks ranged from 15 mpg to 17 mpg based on engine size and other factors, an improvement of just 1 mpg to 3 mpg over the clunkers.

Owners of thousands more large old Chevrolet and Dodge pickups bought new Silverado and Ram trucks, also with only barely improved mileage in the middle teens, according to AP's analysis of sales of $15.2 billion worth of vehicles at nearly 19,000 car dealerships in every state. Those deals helped the Ford F150 and Chevy Silverado - along with Ford's Escape midsize SUV - climb into the Top 10 most-popular vehicles purchased with the government rebates. The most common truck-for-truck and truck-for-SUV deals totaled at least $911 million.

In scores of deals, the government reported spending a total of $562,500 in rebates for new cars and trucks that got worse or the same mileage as the trade-ins - in apparent violation of the program's requirements. The government said it is investigating those reports and said in some cases they were probably entered incorrectly by dealers or based on outdated fuel economy figures.

The new data, obtained by the AP under the Freedom of Information Act, include details of 677,081 clunker trade-ins processed by the government through Oct. 16. More than 95,000 of the new vehicles purchased under the program - or about one in seven - got less than 20 mpg, according to the data.
http://apnews.myway.com//article/20091104/D9BOVMNG0.html

Maybe I missed something. But I thought that the main purpose of the "Cash for Clunkers" program was to put more fuel efficient vehicles back on the road in the "clunkers" place. It appears that we kinda missed the mark on that one.

But, by god, they got fresh auto payments for the banks! They don't seem to miss a beat in scheming to fleece us all at every turn. And stupid pricks just seem to stand in line waiting patiently for the fucking they're about to ask for and get!

What amazes me is that I'm pretty sure that most people SEE the hypocrisy in these public money schemes to continue transferring the wealth to the extremely few. Yet, they smile, open their wallets and sign on the dotted line just the same.

As P.T. Barnum so aptly put it, there is a sucker born every minute.

I might add that if you wish to see one, you need only look in the mirror.

Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 26, 2009

The FOLLY that is Steven E. Streight @vaspersthegrate: oh, it does grate on common sense.

The FOLLY that is Steven E. Streight @vaspersthegrate: oh, it does grate on common sense.

"The Grate" was railing on people and wishing death upon them and I offered two thoughts on his rantings:

http://twitter.com/vaspersthegrate/statuses/5188102786 You don't hurt or annoy me by UnFollowing me. I demand you do so if you suck military dick. I want all soldiers to die now.

http://twitter.com/iamneverright/statuses/5188474639 @vaspersthegrate and what of Veterans Against War?

http://twitter.com/vaspersthegrate/status/5188516908 I admire Veterans Against War. There is room for repentance for everybody.

http://twitter.com/vaspersthegrate/status/5188701742  America's wars are based on lies or poor strategy, then drag on half-heartedly, causing more problems than they solve.

http://twitter.com/iamneverright/statuses/5188943747 @vaspersthegrate America's wars are based on profits for armament industries.

He then protected his tweets and posted this before his feed locked down:

http://twitter.com/vaspersthegrate/status/5189396362 New Twitter spam technique: agree with you in an RT or @. When you check their profile & website, it's a spammer. Block them.

This is the link on my profile: http://heartlandheretic.bogspot.com/ . I can't see the past "heartlandh..." on my profile page, hence have never checked it. The link is fixed now. But one might think that even a moron could see that the "L" was missing in "blogspot". But he called me spam and blocked me. After ridiculing others for blocking HIM! Hypocrisy. If you wish to see some of my commentary before I became so very tired of morons like this one, you may visit http://heartlandheretic.blogspot.com , the name of the blog is "Surviving Christianity"... you know, the bullshit culture that produces pricks like the one above.

Steven E. Streight is a moronic prick who thinks that his shit doesn't stink. Anyone who finds his bilge any less offensive than that of fux news is a moron as well. And this is a prime example as to why I haven't been blogging and seldom even comment on Twitter: the morons are taking over the world. And since there are so many of them and only one of me, it is just easier to put them out of my misery by retiring myself.




Fuck off, world.


Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 12, 2009

Not OK: Oklahoma Inmates Allegedly Raped at Governors Mansion

OKLAHOMA CITY — Prosecutors are investigating claims that the former chef and chief groundskeeper at the Oklahoma governor's mansion raped female prison inmates assigned to maintain the mansion grounds.

Neither man has been charged but both have been fired from their jobs.

State Department of Corrections officials say at least three women who were inmates at the Hillside Community Corrections Center in Oklahoma City contend they were sexually assaulted while working at the mansion between March 2008 and January 2009.

Janet Roloff, an attorney for one of the women, said Monday her client was held down by one man while the other raped her.

Roloff says her client did not report the alleged assault until she completed her sentence because she feared retribution.
Address : <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/brad-henry-rape-scandal-f_n_317720.html>

That's ok. They're just criminals. They don't count anyway. Hell, they're lucky they get to be house slaves at the Governor's Mansion!

I'd kinda like to know what heinous crimes they were guilty of to deserve this treatment. Probably DUI or failure to pay child support! The no good louses.

Capitalism at it finest. I say "Bring back the plantations!"

Share/Bookmark

Saturday, October 10, 2009

It’s Dangerous for Children To Know Atheism Exists

It’s Dangerous for Children To Know Atheism Exists, Says Illinois State Legislator
Posted by Hemant Mehta in General on April 4th, 2008

Outspoken atheist Rob Sherman, who (with his daughter) filed a lawsuit that eventually put a stop to the Mandatory Moment of Silence, was back in the Illinois General Assembly on Wednesday.

He was there arguing Governor Rod Blagojevich’s $1,000,000 grant to the Pilgrim Baptist Church — which was given to them via the more secular Loop Lab School. (Shadiness all around.)

Anyway, he got into an exchange with Rep. Monique Davis (D-Chicago).

You won’t believe what she said (emphasis is mine):


    Davis: I don’t know what you have against God, but some of us don’t have much against him. We look forward to him and his blessings. And it’s really a tragedy — it’s tragic — when a person who is engaged in anything related to God, they want to fight. They want to fight prayer in school.

    I don’t see you (Sherman) fighting guns in school. You know?

    I’m trying to understand the philosophy that you want to spread in the state of Illinois. This is the Land of Lincoln. This is the Land of Lincoln where people believe in God, where people believe in protecting their children.… What you have to spew and spread is extremely dangerous, it’s dangerous–

    Sherman: What’s dangerous, ma’am?

    Davis: It’s dangerous to the progression of this state. And it’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! Now you will go to court to fight kids to have the opportunity to be quiet for a minute. But damn if you’ll go to [court] to fight for them to keep guns out of their hands. I am fed up! Get out of that seat!

    Sherman: Thank you for sharing your perspective with me, and I’m sure that if this matter does go to court—

    Davis: You have no right to be here! We believe in something. You believe in destroying! You believe in destroying what this state was built upon.

According to Davis, atheism is destroying the state.

Corrupt or misguided politicians have nothing to do with it, of course…

As Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune puts it, “consider what the outcry would have been if a lawmaker had launched a similar attack on the beliefs of a religious person.”

If that happened, you might have actually heard about this story by now. It would be playing on news stations everywhere. But since the attack is on atheists, this is likely the first time you’ve read anything about it.

Not enough for you? Listen to the audio of the exchange (MP3).

Infuriating, isn’t it?

(via Change of Subject)

Amazing! These hypocritical jackals know no bounds.

One thing that strikes me about this piece is that this is occurring in the Northern Urban Area of Chicago. I would expect this kind of closed minded bigotry in the South or here in the Mid-South. I can almost understand this kind of ignorance in rural settings.

This appears to be the prevailing mind set for the people who represent us in our government and to the world! Anything that is different from their perception, belief, and world view should be silenced at all cost. Our activities if Af-Pak and elsewhere bear this out.

They insist that these activities are to protect America from those who committed the atrocity of 911 against us. But anyone with more than two active brain cells understands that it is a combination of our greed for oil and... well, they're Muslims. "They're godless heathens. They don't believe as we do." And if they were really trying to get the perpetrators of 911, they would be looking in DC, Texas, and under whatever rock Dick Cheney is currently hiding.

I am growing weary. They are coming to silence me. It is only days away.

And frankly, I'm ready. I'll leave you to the moral morass of mythological superstition that you call civilized society.

I bid you farewell and good luck.

Share/Bookmark

Sunday, October 04, 2009

Elliot Madison Accused Of Using Twitter To Tweet Police Actions At G-20 Protests

NEW YORK — A self-described New York City anarchist has been accused of tweeting the location of police officers to protesters trying to evade them during the Group of 20 economic summit in Pittsburgh.

Pennsylvania State Police arrested Elliot Madison alleging he used Twitter to direct the movement of protesters and inform them about law enforcement actions at last month's summit.

The New York Post reported the arrest in Saturday editions.

Court papers filed by Madison's attorney say FBI agents executed a search warrant at the 41-year-old's Queens home on Thursday. They seized computers, political writings and anarchist literature.

Madison faces charges including hindering prosecution.

His attorney didn't immediately return a call requesting comment Saturday.
Read it here.


Prosecution of what, unlawful suspension of first amendment protections?

Share/Bookmark

Employers Cashing in on Employee Deaths

Free Market Capitalism, otherwise known as unabashed GREED, in all of its glory.


Creepy? Are you sure that's all it is?


Share/Bookmark

Friday, October 02, 2009

Hate coming back "out of the closet", as if it were ever in the closet

Now that the fascists (read Christian Fundamentalists) have lost their control of the government of the United States and their leaders are falling like fleas off of a freshly dipped dog to sex scandals, "contribution" scandals, and just saying stupid shit, the Religious Right and their skin head, racist, gun rights, wife beating brethren are going ape shit nuts, to put it mildly.


Throughout the Bush years, homophobia and professions of anti-racism were twinned in a weird way, as if the latter proved that the right wasn't simply still skulking around history's dark side. At a deeply surreal 2006 event at the Greater Exodus Baptist Church, an African American church in downtown Philadelphia, leaders of the religious right invoked Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks on behalf of gay marriage bans and Bush's judicial nominees. At the end of the evening, several dozen clergymen, black and white, joined hands in prayer at the front of the room. "Black Americans, white Americans," said a beaming Tony Perkins, leader of the Family Research Council. "Christians, standing together." The whole premise of compassionate conservatism -- which shoveled taxpayer money towards administration-friendly churches like Greater Exodus Baptist -- was that the right cared as deeply as the left about issues like inner city poverty.

What a difference an election makes. Even if you believed that compassionate conservatism was always a bit of a con, it's amazing to see how quickly it has vanished, and how fast an older style of reaction, one more explicitly rooted in racial grievance, has reasserted itself.

Today's grassroots right is by all appearances as socially conservative as ever, but its tone and its rhetoric are profoundly different than they were even a year ago. For the last 15 years, the right-wing populism has been substantially electrified by sexual anxiety. Now it's charged with racial anxiety. By all accounts, there were more confederate flags than crosses at last weekend's anti-Obama rally in Washington, DC. Glenn Beck has become a far more influential figure on the right than, say, James Dobson, and he's much more interested in race than in sexual deviancy. For the first time in at least a decade, middle class whites have been galvanized by the fear that their taxes are benefiting lazy, shiftless others. The messianic, imperialistic, hubristic side of the right has gone into retreat, and a cramped, mean and paranoid style has come to the fore.

To some extent, a newfound suspicion of government was probably inevitable as soon as Democrats took power. At the same time, with the implosion of the Christian right's leadership and the last year's cornucopia of GOP sex scandals, the party needed to take a break from incessant moralizing, and required a new ideology to take the place of family values cant. The belief system analysts sometimes call "producerism" served nicely. Producerism sees society as divided between productive workers -- laborers, small businessmen and the like -- and the parasites who live off them. Those parasites exist at both the top and the bottom of the social hierarchy -- they are both financiers and welfare bums -- and their larceny is enabled by the government they control.

Read the whole article here.

Their hate is spilling out into the public discourse in a plethora of ways. From "Teabaggers" in the streets, gun toting extremists at town halls, and talking heads on major "News Networks" (that's you CNN and FOX), to members of Congress and Senators saying the most outrageous things in news conferences and even on the House and Senate floors, the radical right has come completely unhinged.

We have everything from radicals in high office calling for the citizens to arm themselves against the government to Senators advising illegitimate rogue governments to resist the US Government exhortations to resolve their issues democratically. We have former White House advisers calling for US Military Generals to stage a coup right here in the US!

And now they are getting back to their roots of open hostility and the advocating of violence against African Americans, Latinos, non-Christians, and the GLBT community, insinuating, if not out right declaring, that these people are not REALLY people at all. Many of these religious fanatics feel that members of these groups are no more than a sick dog and should be "put down" for their own good!

Yeah, whether you want to admit it to yourself or not, this is how these people think.

This all leads me back to their own "god", Jesus of Nazareth and his teachings. You know, they guy who said that the only" commandment" that He professed was "Love", because if you followed that one you would naturally follow all of the other ones. (I'm para-phrasing here, but I think that I got it pretty close).

Of course, this is all academic to rational, thinking people. But it never ceases to amaze me how the more fanatical people of any faith are, the farther they drift from their own teachings.

These people are just sad. They make me sad. I don't know, perhaps that is their subconscious plan: if they make us all feel sorry for their pathetic world view, maybe we'll leave them alone to keep screaming their lies from the mountain tops.

Yeah, I grow weary at the spectacle of these morons expressing their myths as fact and therefore justification for their bigoted, discriminatory, hateful, murderous behavior. But pity is no reason to stop calling them what they are... just as loudly and with just as much passion as they spew their hate.

I agree that this will likely not solve the "Cracker Problem". But we can't allow their voices to be the only ones being heard. Religious Fundamentalist are by their very definition mentally unstable. I mean, hell, they believe in gods and fairies! (Actually, they call them "God", "Jesus", "Holy Spirit", and "Angels". But let's face it, it's the same thing).

So to speak truth to fiction, these people who are trying so hard to convince everyone that their hate is justified are using myth as their basis in fact at the root of their argument. Can anyone actually tell me that these people are even worth reasoning with?


Share/Bookmark

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Small plane crashes in eastern Indiana field

A single-engine plane crashed into an Indiana field on Wednesday after the pilot, who was seen slumped over, lost consciousness and the aircraft started flying out of control, officials said.

Military officials do not believe the crash was terrorism-related but said the pilot may have had a health problem or have been suffering from a lack of oxygen. After air traffic controllers lost contact with the pilot, F-16s from Indiana National Guard intercepted the plane and followed it for about an hour until it crashed.

Full story here.
The following line of questioning may seem passè and a little dated. But how can they explain, logically, that F-16's followed this plane for an hour when not one single fighter could scramble on 911? I have never bought any of the official line. Even the "NORAD drill" excuse falls short. One doesn't even commit ALL of ones resources to any one thing even in a time of WAR! You ALWAYS keep a backup... you know, for emergencies?


Share/Bookmark

A Child is left behind

The Secret Service has announced that a "child" is behind the Facebook Poll asking if President Obama should be "killed".

Today they announced the results: Turns out a kid was behind the poll. And no criminal charges will be filed against him or his parents, according to the Associated Press, citing a Secret Service spokesman.
...read the whole story here.
Folks would like to say that this is the end of the story. The President is safe and the child never posed a threat to the President. And indeed that may be so. But, you know, that kid got the idea from somewhere.

And where do kids get their religious and political indoctrination more than anywhere else? At their dining room table. Directly from their parents.

So, I would posit that this non-threatening "child" is definitely under the influence of not so un-threatening adults.

I'm not suggesting that the parents be charged in this case for what the child did. But I AM suggesting that we, the rational and thinking "rest of us", should think about it for one moment. Our neighbors are quite possibly indoctrination tomorrows "Timothy McVeigh" or even "Jeffrey Dahmer"!

Can we REALLY say that what we discuss between ourselves behind the closed door of our home does not still find its way into the light of day? Do we really stop and think about the ramifications of each and every utterance that we may make in the privacy of our own homes?

Could YOU be programming a future killer with your own bigoted and prejudiced slurs, even if you think you are saying it in privacy?

Think again. For the first 10 to 15 years, your kid is just a parrot that imitates those around them. And you are likely the biggest influence on that behavior. That "child" merely parroted what he/she heard in their own home, make no mistake about it!


Share/Bookmark

Monday, September 28, 2009

Right-Wing Hatemongering Fueled by Christianity?

I can only breath a sigh of relief that bigotry bashing has finally gone mainstream and we are finally collectively calling a duck a duck.

Right-Wing Hatemongering Fueled by Christianity?
By Frank Schaeffer, AlterNet
Posted on September 21, 2009, Printed on September 28, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/story/142755/

Former president Jimmy Carter went on the record to point out that he believes that racism is at the heart of the great deal of the extreme animosity being leveled at President Obama  (NBC News September 15). Carter identified himself as a Southerner with an insider's understanding.  There's something he didn't mention however: the special culpability of his own religion -- Evangelical Christianity -- for the anti-Obama hyperventilating and furious reaction to our first black president. And that reaction has less to do with race and more to do with the ugliest side of religion.

The fact is that if you're going to blame one group above all others for the willful ignorance and continuing ugliness of the response to President Obama the best candidate would be the evangelical/fundamentalist community.  The angry part of the South Carter spoke of is racist because it's dominated by a certain type of "Christian" culture.

Since Carter is also an evangelical Christian (as well as a Southerner) he would have done well to use his evangelical  insider status to point to not just racism but to scream bloody murder about a bigger problem today: the hijacking of Christianity as the source of the hate and anger directed against all things "other" by a vocal (and health care lobby-organized and funded) angry  minority of voters who are poisoning the American body. 

American Christianity Is At The Heart Of Our Worst Problems

Are the New Atheists leading us to enlightenment? The problem with the recent New Atheist attacks on Christianity is that they mirror the hostility of the evangelical/fundamentalist subculture toward the secular society that it so disdains.  The real answer to the question; "Can Christianity be saved from the Christians?" is not going to be found coming from people like Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris et al. Instead that answer may be found in the life and work of Christians such as former president Jimmy Carter, President Obama,  the late writer John Updike, and other public figures from Desmond Tutu to Nelson Mandela who's faith can be taken seriously because of the moral authority given them by their achievements outside the realm of theology.

The people running around calling Obama is "Hitler", the so-called "birthers" and all the rest can't be understood outside of the context of the hermetically sealed world-hating gated community known as Evangelical Christianity.  As a former Evangelical and son of an Evangelical Religious Right leader, let me share a little of the insider perspective that I wish Carter had brought to the subject.

What Defines American Evangelicals These Days?

The key to understanding the Evangelicals is to understand the popularity of the Left Behind series of books about the "return of Christ" (and the whole host of other End Times "ministries" from the ever weirder Jack-the-Rapture-is-coming!-Van-Impe to the smoother but no less bizarre pages of Christianity Today magazine). This isn't some new or sudden interest in prophecy, but evidence of the deepening inferiority complex suffered by the evangelical/fundamentalist community.

Left Behind

The words "left behind" are ironically what the books are about, but not in the way their authors intended. The evangelical/fundamentalists, from their crudest egocentric celebrities to their "intellectuals" touring college campuses trying to make evangelicalism respectable, have indeed been left behind by modernity. They won't change their literalistic anti-science, anti-education, anti-everything superstitions, so now they nurse a deep grievance against "the world."

This has led to a profound fear of the "other." Jenkins and LaHaye (the Left Behind authors) provide the ultimate revenge fantasy for the culturally left behind against the "elite." The Left Behind franchise holds out hope for the self-disenfranchised that at last soon everyone will know "we" were right and "they" were wrong. They'll know because Spaceship Jesus will come back and whisk "us" away, leaving everyone else to ponder just how very lost they are because they refused to say the words, "I accept Jesus as my personal savior" and join our side while there was still time!

The bestselling status of the Left Behind novels proves that, not unlike Islamist terrorists who behead their enemies, many evangelical/ fundamentalist readers relish the prospect of God doing lots of messy killing for them as they watch in comfort from on high. They want revenge on all people not like them--forever.

Generations Of Indoctrination

We are several generations into the progeny of leaders such as James Dobson and his radio show Focus On The Family. These offspring extol the virtues of corporal punishment, patriarchy, applying biblical law to public governance and so forth.  Millions of evangelicals have been raised in homes where they've been isolated from the wider culture, home schooled and/or sent to "Christian schools" where they have been indoctrinated to believe that the Federal Government is the enemy of all true believers, that the "End" is near, that secular society is their enemy as is art, learning and culture.

They now form a Fifth Column of the deliberately intellectually disenfranchised. They know they are out of the loop and hate the rest of us for their own self-imposed isolation. I'm afraid they will soon turn to violence.

Here Are The Alternatives To Change the Theologically-Induced Hate Landscape:

A) all sane Americans must become atheists or agnostics,

or...

B) those of us who are Christians must rescue Christianity from the willfully ignorant evangelicals and fundamentalists.

I favor the second alternative.  First, having been raised in an evangelical/fundamentalist home I've long since moved beyond my background when it comes to my politics and my theology. That proves something; people can change their minds! I did.

But I believe more strongly than ever that we human beings are spiritual beings with or without the permission of those who take a purely rationalist approach to human existence.  The better -- and I think only realistic option -- is to regard religion as an evolving process of human consciousness and work to reform rather than eliminate it

In my soon-to-be published book Patience With God: Faith For People Who Don't Like Religion (Or Atheism) I have very deliberately started a radical conversation through which I hope many of us can carve out a position that embraces religion while absolutely rejecting the type of insanity that has become synonymous with the word "Christian" in contemporary America.

Two "Threads" In Religion

As I argue in my new book the choice between the absolutist secular fundamentalism of the New Atheism and the authoritarianism of James Dobson's-type of "Christianity" is no choice at all. The better alternative is to understand that there are two main threads running all through almost all religions including Christianity:

1) an open, inclusive and questioning thread

and...

2) a closed and exclusionary thread.

The more open thread is not some modern phenomenon developed by "liberal thinking." As I explain in Patience With God this "thread" can be found in the earliest Christianity and Judaism.

If you look around and see  good results from Christianity, say from the invention of modern hospitals, which have their roots in religious groups or the music of JS Bach, you're looking at the fruits of the best of the open tradition and thread.  When you see a group of scared racist white people like Joe Wilson in Washington DC screaming "liar" or "Obama is a socialist" or "Obama wasn't born in America" you're seeing the madness of the other thread: fundamentalism that wants absolute certainty about everything, and forces its followers to live in a narrower and narrower field of existence.

Conclusion

Christianity is worth saving from the Christians for two reasons.  First, because as moral and spiritual beings religion should feed our souls rather then strip out our humanity.  Second, because whether we like it or not, religion is here to stay. Better to shape it rather than to simply denounce it.

I may be an idealist but I believe that if others will step forward and add to what I have tried to begin with my new book together we can give good answers to both the extremes of the New Atheists and to the hate of the Evangelical fundamentalists. Join me to build a better vision. We might actually be able to change the conversation in America about religion. 

Is that important? Yes, like it or not religion will not go away. It motivates the worst in the American psyche and some of the best too. It is Joe Wilson's religion of hate but it also motivated Martin Luther King Jr.

Perhaps a generation from now the image of a typical Christian won't be a hate-monger like James Dobson but rather a lover of peace such as Bishop Desmond Tutu, or a literary giant like John Updike, and yes, a President Obama.

The only real answer to the hijacking of Christianity by the Religious Right, the longevity of religion-based racism, and the backward and inward looking movement we now call "American Christianity" is not to talk everyone out a having faith but rather to fight for the humane and ancient thread found within the Christian tradition. Blaming everything on race is too easy.

If you get the chance to read Patience With God please let me know what you think of it. I'm asking one big question in the book: Can Christianity be rescued from the Christians? You tell me.

Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of Crazy for God: How I Grew Up As One Of The Elect, Helped Found The Religious Right, And Lived To Take All (Or Almost All) Of It Back.
© 2009 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/142755/


Share/Bookmark

Thursday, September 24, 2009

What the hell are you women putting on your FACES?!!!!

What the hell are you women putting on your FACES?!!!!
Terrorism suspect Najibullah Zazi plotted for more than a year to detonate homemade bombs in the United States, had recently bought bomb-making supplies from beauty supply stores and was looking for "urgent" help in the past two weeks to make explosives, an indictment charged today.

Address : <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/24/terrorism-usa-najibullah-zazi-denver>
I've gotta say that this is some pretty scary stuff! The guy bought his bomb making supplies at BEAUTY SUPPLY STORES?

Guys, how many times have you seen some bar fly with a ton of make-up on at the end of the bar light up a cig? How many times have YOU lit it for her? And she held it with fingernails painted florescent RED?
I don't know if I'll ever be able to get close enough to a terroristic, makeup wearing woman to kiss her ever again! (Not that anyone wants me to kiss them anyway).

Ya know, I don't mean to belittle this incident. I'm quite sure that there are people out there that are truly planning to attack innocent civilians here in the United States. It's a real problem that deserves real attention.

But those who are charged with the task of ferreting out these threats have cried wolf about "Islamic Fundamentalist" with ties to Iran, Afghanistan, and other Islamic countries too many times for me to be very worried about these people much. I figure that they are for the most part watching with glee as we tear ourselves apart from the inside!

And that being said, I suspect that the real violent threat from within lies in the far right fringe groups. You know, like the ones who kill doctors in their church for doing their job. The ones who walk into museums and shoot everyone in sight. The "TeaBagger" type who simply "want our country back"!

You know, the kind who listen to and support people like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs, Bill O'Rielly, and their ilk?

You know... fascists.

shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

The Truth About Two Racists—Beck and Limbaugh

For the record:

The Truth About Two Racists—Beck and Limbaugh
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090923_the_racist_truth_about_beck_and_limbaugh/
Posted on Sep 24, 2009

By Joe Conason

With admirable calm, President Obama has sought to deflect the supercharged politics of race by expressing his optimism about American attitudes and ignoring the most extreme statements by his critics. For his own sake, as well as the nation’s, he is wise to give a pass to the likes of Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh. That is not, however, what they deserve.

The behavior of those media provocateurs over the past few months is almost beyond parody. They call the president a racist, even though there is no evidence of prejudice on his part and much evidence to the contrary. They demand that nobody should ever point out racial prejudice, but spend hours on the airwaves making false claims of bias against whites. And they whine constantly about being called racists, even though the president has never made that accusation against them.

“You can’t get your agenda,” protested Beck the other day, speaking of the president, “so you unleash the hounds and point the fingers, and everybody is a racist.” That was around the same time Obama’s spokesman said quite emphatically that the president does not believe his opponents are motivated by racism.

But since Beck and Limbaugh seem to be obsessed with this touchy subject, let’s examine their record. It turns out that both established their keen racial sensitivity on air long ago.

Back when Beck was simply a coked-out zoo-style morning talk jock on a Kentucky station—rather than a national political philosopher—he regularly mimicked African-American speech patterns for fun. “He used to do a funny ‘black guy’ character, really over the top,” recalls one of his former colleagues, quoted by biographer Alexander Zaitchik in a fascinating Salon profile.

Beck also became a devotee of the Mormon crank author and conspiracy theorist W. Cleon Skousen, whose writings he enthusiastically promotes to this day. Among Skousen’s pet theories was that Southern slave owners were actually the victims of the plantation system, which according to him favored the lazy and pampered slaves, whose children he called “pickaninnies.” Like his ultraright friends in the John Birch Society and kindred groups, Skousen was a dedicated foe of civil rights legislation.

Does that mean Beck is a bigot? If Obama had ever endorsed the writings of Louis Farrakhan, replete with vile slurs against whites and especially Jews, that would certainly be enough for Beck—who says he believes that the president has “a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture.” That must be why the Obama White House has so many whites of all ethnic and religious backgrounds advising the president, from the Cabinet down.

As for Limbaugh, perhaps nobody remembers the time that he told a black caller to “take that bone out of your nose”; or the time when he said the nonviolent NAACP “should get a liquor store and practice robberies”; or the many times when he would play the “Movin’ On Up” theme from the old “Jeffersons” TV show to accompany his commentary about Carol Moseley Braun, the first black woman in the United States Senate. He used to do mocking bits in black dialect, too. But who needs to remember those sorry episodes when he continues that ugly pattern on air nearly every day?

The Limbaugh show reached a new low recently when he began a campaign around a school-bus incident in Belleville, Ill., in which two black students were videotaped beating up a white kid. Police authorities first said they believed the assailants were motivated by race, but later said it was just a nasty bullying assault (for which the two little thugs are now being prosecuted).

But Limbaugh could not resist the opportunity to turn that nastiness into something much more dangerous. “It’s Obama’s America, is it not? Obama’s America—white kids getting beat up on school buses now. I mean, you put your kids on a school bus, you expect safety, but in Obama’s America, the white kids now get beat up, with the black kids cheering.” In a more reflective mood, he later asked, “Can this nation really have an African-American president?”

Yes, we can—and despite the racial poison spread by Beck and Limbaugh, most Americans are proud that at long last, we do.
Address : <http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/20090923_the_racist_truth_about_beck_and_limbaugh/>

shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Monday, September 21, 2009

Highly religious states have top teen birth rates

Highly religious states have top teen birth rates
A new study shows that states that skew towards more conservative religious beliefs tend to have higher rates of teenage girls giving birth. (Shocking, I know.)

Researcher Joseph Strayhorn of Drexel University College of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh says,"We conjecture that religious communities in the U.S. are more successful in discouraging the use of contraception among their teenagers than they are in discouraging sexual intercourse itself."

Now, obviously studies like these have the whole correlation/causation issue going on - but from the work I did write The Purity Myth, this study makes sense to me.

If you grow up in an area where you're taught that sex is bad and contraception is evil (and that it can kill you), when you do have pre-marital sex - as 95% of Americans will - you're much less likely to protect yourself. Not only because you've been taught that condoms cause cancer and other such ridiculousness, but also because you may think that if sex happens in the heat of the moment - and you didn't plan for it like a bad, slutty girl - you're not as tainted.
Posted by Jessica - September 21, 2009, at 08:31AM
http://www.feministing.com/archives/017841.html 

These very same people tend to be the least educated as well. There is something in nearly all religions that suggests that education, open mindedness, and open inquiry are inherently evil. They are taught certain core beliefs from birth upon which to base all other beliefs. And these core beliefs are fallacious myths which are expected to be accepted by faith. Reaching these people with factual information is like trying to strike a match under water.   

shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Friday, September 18, 2009

Former Bush Official Loses It ... Accuses Obama of Having 'Fascist, Socialist Ideals'

Former Bush Official Loses It ... Accuses Obama of Having 'Fascist, Socialist Ideals'

TPMDC reports that Ellen Sauerbrey, who served as President Bush’s Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration, told a local Republican group in Maryland last week that President Obama was following in the footsteps of global dictators:

She said that the Obama administration advanced “fascist, socialist ideals.”

“I’m really afraid for the future of our country,” Sauerbrey told attendees at the annual Lincoln/Reagan Dinner of Sept. 12 in Callaway. “Our Constitution is indeed being dismantled.”

In an interview with TPMDC, Sauerbrey tried to back away from her comments, insisting that she “mentioned Hitler’s name other than when the reporter came up to me afterwards,” she said. “And I said, look, I am not making a direct comparison Obama and Hitler. I’m making a comparison between policies in countries, and that history has a way of repeating itself.” Bush’s appointment of Sauerbrey in 2005 was widely panned because she had “no experience responding to major crises calling for international relief” and was nothing more than a “patronage” appointment. [via Alternet]


Yeah, tolerance for different races and cultures is certainly a Fascist Ideal. Assbag.

...she has relentlessly pressed an antiabortion and anti-family-planning agenda at international conferences meant to focus on urgent problems like sexual trafficking and the spread of AIDS. She also oversaw the admissions of refugees for permanent resettlement in the United States. One who is anti-immigrant?

The only part that I see where she got anything even partially right is where she said the Constitution "is being" dismantled. Indeed, her boss GW did a great job of that. If Mr. Obama even wanted to reinstate Constitutional Rights, he would have to fight an army of bipolar conservatives.

And just so you (and every other moron) know it, Fascism is a tendency of the extreme right. It blows my mind to hear all of these fascists accusing everyone of being fascist.

But it demonstrates that someone (not necessarily the moron doing the screaming) has been doing their homework:

Propaganda Student Handout

Types of Propaganda

There are many different propaganda techniques used during World War II. The following is a list with a short description of each type.

1. APPEAL TO AUTHORITY: Appeals to authority cite prominent figures to supports a position, idea, argument, or course of action.

2. BANDWAGON: The basic idea behind the bandwagon approach is just that, "getting on the bandwagon." Either everyone is doing it or supporting this person or cause, so you should too. The bandwagon approach appeals to the conformist in all of us: No one wants to be left out of what is perceived to be a popular trend.

3. TESTIMONIAL: This is the endorsement of a philosophy, movement or candidate. While celebrities are usually used, it can be people who supposedly "know" about the topic or situation.

4. PLAIN FOLKS: Here the candidate or cause is identified with common people from everyday walks of life. The idea is to make the candidate/cause come off as grassroots, all-American, for the common man.

5. TRANSFER: Transfer employs the use of symbols, quotes or the images of famous people to convey a message not necessarily associated with them. In the use of transfer, the posters attempt to persuade us through the indirect use of something we respect, such as a patriotic or religious image, to promote specific ideas.

6. FEAR: This technique is very popular during wartime. The idea is to present a dreaded circumstance and usually follow it up with the kind of behavior needed to avoid that horrible event.

7. GLITTERING GENERALITIES: This approach is closely related to what is happening in TRANSFER (see above). Here, a generally accepted virtue is usually employed to stir up favorable emotions. The problem is that these words mean different things to different people and are often manipulated for the propagandists' use. The important thing to remember is that in this technique the propagandist uses these words in a positive sense. They often include words like: democracy, family values (when used positively), rights, civilization, even the word "American."

8. NAME-CALLING: This is the opposite of the GLITTERING GENERALITIES approach. Name-calling ties a person or cause to a largely perceived negative image.

"Propaganda Techniques" is based upon "Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques" from "Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1" published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979

Source


shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Thursday, September 17, 2009

New Protest Over Government Spending

Hold on to your heads for this one, folks...


Rep. Kevin Brady [R-TX8] asked for an explanation of why the government-run subway system didn’t, in his view, adequately prepare for this past weekend’s rally to protest government spending and government services.

Seriously.

The Texas Republican on Wednesday released a letter he sent to Washington’s Metro system complaining that the taxpayer-funded subway system was unable to properly transport protesters to the rally to protest government spending and expansion.
Address : http://blogs.wsj.com



So, he is mad that the government didn't spend enough money to prepare for the Teabaggers to come and protest government spending.

Can anyone spell d-e-m-e-n-t-i-a? I suppose it would be too much to hope that these idiots will one day see how retarded they appear to the rest of us.




shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Is Glenn Beck Bad for America?

Is Glenn Beck Bad for America?
The inevitable question is, How much of this industry is sincere? Last year, shortly after the election, Beck spoke with TIME's Kate Pickert, and he didn't sound very scared back then. Of Obama's early personnel decisions, he said, "I think so far he's chosen wisely." Of his feelings about the President: "I am not an Obama fan, but I am a fan of our country ... He is my President, and we must have him succeed. If he fails, we all fail." Of the Democratic Party: "I don't know personally a single Democrat who is a dope-smoking hippie that wants to turn us into Soviet Russia." Of the civic duty to trust: "We've got to pull together, because we are facing dark, dark times. I don't trust a single weasel in Washington. I don't care what party they're from. But unless we trust each other, we're not going to make it."

For the record, as if it needs to be said (and actually, I guess someone needs to say it and keep repeating it), Glenn Beck is not anyone's messiah. He is a snake oil salesman, a street hawking, insincere fake who is only making a buck off of fostering and festering extremist fear.

Don't buy into it. Boycott Beck!


Limbaugh Wants Jim Crow Back: "We Need Segregated Buses"

Limbaugh Wants Jim Crow Back: "We Need Segregated Buses"
Limbaugh Wants Jim Crow Back: "We Need Segregated Buses"

Posted by Zaid Jilani, Think Progress at 8:22 AM on September 17, 2009.

In "Obama's America," Rush cries, "the white kids now get beat up."

Last week, a video of a school bus beating showing two African American children assaulting a white student began circulating the internet. Despite claims by authorities that the attack was not necessarily racially motivated, hate radio host Rush Limbaugh jumped on the story and claimed that in "Obama's America the white kids now get beat up." Yesterday, Limbaugh proposed a solution to this problem -- a return to segregated busing:

LIMBAUGH: I think the guy's wrong. I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism. I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses -- it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama's America.

This is a dangerous man. He actually carries more weight (no pun intended) with conservatives than Bilbo Beck!

I mean, think about it. I man with millions of "followers" (sheeple, extremists, fundamentalists) in America advocating segregation? What does THIS guy have to do to get canned? He has actually said a lot more offensive stuff than what Beck said, not that what Beck said is out of bounds because it most certainly is.

But if we can pressure advertisers to stop sponsoring hate speech coming from the mouth of Beck, why can't we stop the scurrilous stuff coming from Boss Hogg and his medicated mind? News flash: the meds ain't working! He's an ass on and off of them!

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Text Of The Resolution Of Disapproval Of Rep. Joe Wilson

Text Of The Resolution Of Disapproval Of Rep. Joe Wilson | LiveWire
Whereas on September 9, 2009, during the joint session of Congress convened pursuant to House Concurrent Resolution 179, the President of the United States, speaking at the invitation of the House and Senate, had his remarks interrupted by the Representative from South Carolina, Mr. Wilson; and

Whereas the conduct of the Representative from South Carolina was a breach of decorum and degraded the proceedings of the joint session, to the discredit of the House: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the behavior of the Representative from South Carolina, Mr. Wilson, during the joint session of Congress held on September 9, 2009.

Gee, if those guys need some help with harsh rebukes I'd be glad to offer my assistance. I hope this "disapproval" means a little more than it sounds like it does. I'm not sure that I would even be satisfied with censure, though.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Uruguay and US fear arms race

Tabaré Vázquez and Hillary Clinton express concern that recent weapons purchases could lead to an arms race

Uruguay and the United States expressed concern today that recent weapons purchases could lead to an arms race in South America.

In a joint appearance, Tabaré Vázquez, Uruguay's president, and Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, also pledged cooperation on trade.

Clinton singled out Venezuela, urging it to disclose its arms purchases and make clear what they are for. She said: "They should be putting in place procedures to ensure that weapons they buy are not diverted to insurgent groups or illegal organisations like drug trafficking gangs and other cartels."

"We hope that we can see a change in behaviour and attitudes on the part of the Venezuelan government."

Vázquez said he feared that an arms race in the region could divert funds from economic development in the poor countries of the region. "We believe that it is quite inconvenient to the region to devote such significant economic resources for purchasing arms," he said, speaking through an interpreter.

Hugo Chávez, Venezuela's president, said on Sunday that Russia has opened a $2.2bn line of credit with which his country could buy weapons. He said Venezuela needed more arms because it felt threatened by Colombia's decision to give US troops greater access to its military bases.

Address : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/15/uruguay-arms-race-venezuela
How about Ms Clinton and the United States put "in place procedures to ensure that weapons they buy are not diverted to insurgent groups or illegal organisations like drug trafficking gangs and other cartels" regarding their own transactions? (Iran-Contra, Iraq/Iran, Afghanistan/USSR, etc.)

You know, if you want to demand "transparency" from others, you might consider a little transparency of your own. You self-righteous pot calling kettle black a$$h0le.


shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Polling place church sign questioning Obama’s citizenship

Polling place tiff erupts over North Richland Hills church sign questioning Obama’s citize...


Polling place tiff erupts over North Richland Hills church sign questioning Obama’s citizenship

By AMAN BATHEJA

abatheja@star-telegram.com

Democrats and Republicans are divided over what to do about Maplewood Baptist Fellowship.

The North Richland Hills church has operated as a polling place for over 15 years but has recently drawn attention for a sign questioning President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

Pastor Gary Hopkins said he put up the message "Where’s the Birth Certificate?" on his church’s sign about two months ago. He changed the message last week.

"I put it up to get people to ask questions, just to provoke thoughts and that’s pretty much it," Hopkins said. "I do know there are a lot of people asking that question, and my understanding is that question has not been answered."

Local Democrats first noticed the sign last month. The Tarrant County Democratic Party posted a photo of the sign on its Web site with the message: "Do you feel comfortable with this being a polling location?"

Tarrant County Elections Administrator Steve Raborn said he was sent the photo of the sign and contacted Hopkins about it. Raborn said the church can remain a polling place as long as it does not post any political messages during elections.

"We have other polling places at nonelection times that have political activities," Raborn said.

I have long objected to churches being used as political elections polling locations. To begin with, at face value it is a clear violation of the separation of church and state. I would think that this alone would be clear to all. But then their behavior, as described in this piece and countless others, should serve to demonstrate exactly why these places should be excluded. Besides posting their clearly partisan beliefs, they can also intimidate others in making their personal choices in the elections. Intimidation techniques that they employ are passive/aggressive in nature.

You know, the "you'll go to hell" kind of crap.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Statement from ACORN regarding recent news reports

Author: Bertha Lewis
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 09/12/09 15:45

The following is a statement from ACORN Chief Organizer Bertha Lewis, September 12, 2009, Regarding Recent News Reports

The relentless attacks on ACORN’s members, its staff and the policies and positions we promote are unprecedented. An international entertainment conglomerate, disguising itself as a “news” agency (Fox), has expended millions, if not tens of millions of dollars, in their attempt to destroy the largest community organization of Black, Latino, poor and working class people in the country. It is not coincidence that the most recent attacks have been launched just when health care reform is gaining traction. It is clear they’ve had these tapes for months.

We are their Willy Horton for 2009. We are the boogeyman for the right-wing and its echo chambers. If ACORN did not exist, the right-wing would have needed to create us in order to achieve their agenda, their missions, their ideal, retrograde America. This recent scam, which was attempted in San Diego, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia to name a few places, had failed for months before the results we’ve all recently seen. I am appalled and angry; I cannot and I will not defend the actions of the workers depicted in the video, who have since been terminated. But it is clear that the videos are doctored, edited, and in no way the result of the fabricated story being portrayed by conservative activist “filmmaker” O’Keefe and his partner in crime. And, in fact, a crime it was - our lawyers believe a felony - and we will be taking legal action against Fox and their co-conspirators.

We will not be intimidated by this international conglomerate, which has made as its mission the destruction of our organization. ACORN members are committed to the empowerment of their communities - Black, Latino, poor, and working class – at the deepest level. We are an organization committed to halting the foreclosure crisis and keeping people in their homes. We are an organization committed to ensuring quality, affordable health care for every American. We are an organization that will not be stopped in our commitment to our members and our communities which has included:

Helping hundreds of thousands of African-American and Latino voters register to vote and get to the polls in recent years;

Preparing, since 2004, approximately 150,000 free tax returns totaling $190 million in refunds and increased earned income tax credit participation;

Providing effective foreclosure prevention advocacy saving thousands of American families from losing their homes to foreclosure.

ACORN's website: www.acorn.org
Address : http://pww.org


shareBlogarama - The Blog DirectoryDigg!Blog Directory - Blogged

Friday, September 11, 2009

Capitol Briefing - Lobbying Firm Says It Only Forged 13 Letters, Not 14

Capitol Briefing - Lobbying Firm Says It Only Forged 13 Letters, Not 14
Lobbying Firm Says It Only Forged 13 Letters, Not 14

By David A. Fahrenthold
A day after Congressional investigators said they'd found a 14th forged letter written to Congress by a lobbying firm working for the coal industry, the firm on Friday said that was not the case.

Bonner & Associates, the firm at which a now-fired employee wrote the faked letters, said there were 13 and no more. The 14th letter, which appeared to come from an American Legion post in Rocky Mount, Va., was legitimate, the firm said.

Or at least, legitimate by the rules of Washington lobbying.

Here's the firm's account of what happened, from Bonner's attorneys at the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld:

An employee at Bonner & Associates, which was working for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, talked to someone at the American Legion post. Then they FedExed a pre-written letter to the post, asking U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.) to protect American energy independence and keep electricity costs low as the House debated a climate-change bill.

Then the letter was FedExed back, with the signature of post Adjutant Charles Santrock.

"We have no indication that it isn't legitimate," said John Sopko, a partner at Akin Gump.

But, on Capitol Hill today, a spokesman for the committee investigating the letters say they still believe the letter is faked. Eben Burnham-Snyder, a spokesman for the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said investigators have talked to Santrock, and he told them it's not his signature.

"The story hasn't changed," Burnham-Snyder said.

Santrock, of course, is the one person who might clear this up. But, when the Washington Post called this afternoon, a woman who answered the phone said he was out playing golf.

By all means, don't bother the guy during his game of golf!

I'm glad we have this pesky little matter taken care of. I certainly wouldn't want to accuse them of 14 counts of fraud when they only committed 13!