Saturday, November 07, 2009

When "Confidential" isn't really that confidential

Does anyone else see a problem with the following excerpt from Yahoo! News?

Senior Obama administration officials have stepped up consultations with key allies, laying the ground for an announcement on strategy and troop levels.

In his confidential troop request, McChrystal said 40,000 additional troops were needed to help secure Afghan population centers and to give NATO some additional resources to take on Taliban and al Qaeda fighters in outlying areas.

When it is reported on Yahoo! News, it's not all that fucking confidential, now is it?

And I seem to remember something about the cock sucker, McMeth, going public with his demands some time ago, too. So, why the pretense?

Share/Bookmark